A History of Fascism, 1914–1945
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Get 30 days of Standard free
Buy Now for £22.72
-
Narrated by:
-
Michael Kramer
-
By:
-
Stanley G. Payne
About this listen
Focusing mostly on Italy and Germany but also considering Spain, Romania, Japan, and movements in other countries, Payne (history, University of Wisconsin) describes fascism as revolutionary ultranationalism based on national rebirth, extreme elitism, mass mobilization, and the promotion of violence and military virtues. He also suggests that the early Russian communists borrowed many techniques from fascism, and that though we are fairly well-inoculated against fascism itself, the values it represents could still emerge in new forms.
©1995 the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System (P)2018 Blackstone PublishingExcellent insight into this political phenomenon
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The author highlights the many types of Fascism and highlights the difficulty of defining what exactly Fascism is.
At the same time the author presents a wide ranging analysis of definitions, causes and outcomes.
The narration is excellent but can be a little soporific but that is no bad thing.
Being a scholarly work the prose can be a little dry at times and it is very different to narrative history. Educational, thought provoking, pertinent and at times alarming.
I would highly recommend this book.
A comprehensive yet pertinent academic analysis.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
So just as an easy example, at the beer hall putsch march, he claims hitler threw himself to the ground. Rather than he had linked arms with another marcher who was shot and dragged him down. Not an important error, but it shows a lack of research.
He claims the SPD did not engage in paramilitary actions ignoring the existence off reichsbanner.
There are very few if any actual examples, of where what he claims happened. Like saying the Communists borrowed from Nazis, where, when, what. Readers are just expected to take it on board, he also ignored that Nazis also borrowed tactics from the Communists. For example they used the throwing leaflets from trucks driving around the streets tactic that the Communists first used.
I got fed up because off this, so badly written. Not well performed by the reader.
Many minor errors throws shade on other claims
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.