Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DARRELL DEMARCUS GOLDEN
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed: 2026-06-23
Docket: 4:24-cr-00066-JRH-CLR-1
The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representing the appellant and affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. The court applied the standard established in *Anders v. California*, conducting an independent review of the trial record to assess the appeal’s merit. Finding no arguable issues of merit, the court concluded that counsel’s assessment was correct and issued a summary affirmation without oral argument. As a result, the defendant’s conviction and sentence from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia remain in effect.
Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.