In Praise of the Office
The Limits to Hybrid and Remote Work
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Audible Standard 30-day free trial
Buy Now for £11.66
-
Narrated by:
-
Sean Pratt
About this listen
Five years after the pandemic forced a global experiment in remote work, organizations are facing a critical inflection point. For the first time, we have evidence, drawn from experience and research, on what works and what doesn’t.
In their important new book, In Praise of the Office: The Limits to Hybrid and Remote Work, Wharton professor Peter Cappelli and workplace strategist Ranya Nehmeh deliver a balanced, research-based approach to navigating the complex landscape of remote and hybrid work. They provide a fresh perspective on why hybrid models often fail and what organizations must do differently to succeed in this new era—with takeaways that may not be welcome to all.
In this timely book, discover:
- Why remote work succeeded initially but has become increasingly problematic over time
- What has been lost with the move away from in-office work
- The hidden benefits of in-person work
- How work dynamics post-pandemic have further influenced workplace culture and employee attitudes
- How career advancement opportunities have changed
- How new hires are faring
- How the changes have impacted home life
In Praise of the Office also reveals when in-office works best, when fully remote work works best, and what is required to make hybrid work. Plus, it identifies what aspects of hybrid can do the most damage to employers and employees.
Fast and practical, In Praise of the Office offers all of us—employers and employees alike— the tools and insights to make informed decisions about the future of work, whether navigating a return-to-office initiative, refining hybrid models, or fully embracing remote work. Cappelli and Nehmeh provide leaders with the clarity and direction to build stronger, more resilient workplaces.
In summary the book first says that Office is best and everything else doesn't work especially for junior and new workers.
It then gives a page to the future of work, remote first and remote only. An in passing comment that this only works for smallish companies that have never had an office or a minimal amount of office space. Without analyzing why an office is unnecessary if a company has not been designed around one. Plus mentioning that it works best for tech companies.
There is no mention of the huge cost savings, or the fact that 70% of USA tech creators - the engineers are foreign workers.
No discussion of the benefits of working in a global team.
No discussion of what full remote companies detachment from the geo centric burden provides.
I guess I had to some extent expected a biased diatribe, but as the author is an academic then this is a very unacademic way to justify old fashioned practises - like books printed on paper, using horses for transport or offices.
I expected a proper analysis of remote disadvantages- ie what does not work well with legacy company organization and process, along with the advantages that it provides that are not possible in an office, then a weighing up and assessment that the disadvantages out weight the advantages - with analysis why.
But the offices advantages are repeated again and again, basically saying hybrid doesn't work that well, because people aren't in the office! Whilst remote - err we have no academic analysis of remote only companies so we will just ignore that.
Finally it mentions Jamie Dymon - who has just spent $3 billion over the past 5 years building his huge white elephant - 270 Park Avenue in New York. He is basically fighting to keep hold of his job, which totally depends on an office being essential narrative - so the board ignore his massive costly blunder of 270 Park Avenue.
Office centric whinge about how to end Hybrid work
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.