Material Girls
Why Reality Matters for Feminism
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Audible Standard 30-day free trial
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection.
Listen to your selected audiobooks as long as you're a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for £5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.
Buy Now for £14.35
-
Narrated by:
-
Kathleen Stock
-
By:
-
Kathleen Stock
About this listen
'A call for cool heads at a time of great heat and a vital reminder that revolutions don't always end well' Sunday Times
Material Girls is a timely and trenchant critique of the influential theory that we all have an inner feeling known as a gender identity, and that this feeling is more socially significant than our biological sex.
Professor Kathleen Stock surveys the philosophical ideas that led to this point, and closely interrogates each one, from De Beauvoir's statement that, 'One is not born, but rather becomes a woman' (an assertion she contends has been misinterpreted and repurposed), to Judith Butler's claim that language creates biological reality, rather than describing it. She looks at biological sex in a range of important contexts, including women-only spaces and resources, healthcare, epidemiology, political organization and data collection.
Material Girls makes a clear, humane and feminist case for our retaining the ability to discuss reality, and concludes with a positive vision for the future, in which trans rights activists and feminists can collaborate to achieve some of their political aims.©2021 Kathleen Stock
Critic reviews
[Material Girls] pack[s] a punch . . . A call for cool heads at a time of great heat and a vital reminder that revolutions don't always end well
Reading the book I felt an intense sense of relief that finally a comprehensive account of gender identity theory was presented and explored with both clarity and depth . . . a clear, concise, easy-to-read account of the issues between sex, gender and feminism . . . an important book, and it is the middle ground who need to read it as it shows how, if we are to live in a world where gender identity trumps biological sex, then it will be women - the physically weaker sex - who lose out
In her commitment to free speech, good-faith debate, clear and careful argument and upholding reason over dogma, Stock writes faithfully in the tradition of the Enlightenment
A fearless, rigorous study of gender identity . . . [Material Girls is] a brave, enlightening, closely argued book
A clear-sighted analysis in tricky territory
Anyone who has felt confounded by the shifting debate about sex and gender will find some clarity here. More importantly, you will find a curious mind and a generous spirit (Sarah Ditum)
A really important book for our age
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I became interested to seek an answer to why two progressive ideas (namely some strands of feminism and trans activism) seem to be attacking each other so viciously when those on the right would expect them to be natural bedfellows. This book provided a great introduction to the debate to me, although still left me questioning why it has generated such vitriol (not a question the book sets out to answer).
I found Stock's argument for a real basis of biological sex persuasive, particularly the use of the 'cluster model of sex' which has good parallels in the way which biologists (my field) think about species. I once argued the idea of a species was a made up construct to a university tutor, because of edge cases like ring species which don't fit the mould. But he argued back persuasively that species were real with the concept of cluster models. I also find Stock's argument persuasive about cases where 'sex' as a concept as opposed to gender identity continues to be important, particularly in the case of sport, and safe spaces for women.
One criticism I have is the assertion that most cis-gendered people don't have a strong gender identity. I would argue from person experience that I do. I am male, I feel male, masculinity feels part of my identity. Shaving, driving, shooting, working out. All these things make me feel a sense of maleness, But I'm not trans, my identity matches my sex. So I would assert I do feel a gender identify even though I am cis-gendered.
On reflection, I think the debate forms part of a wider tendency on the left to shut down debate by labelling opponents in such a way that what ever they say is delegitimised. You criticise Israeli government policy? You must be anti-Semitic. You support Brexit? You must harbour racist views. You critique gender identify theory, you must be a TERF. I commend this book for refusing to to be cancelled.
A great introduction for an outsider to the debate
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Essential reading
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
A helpful map for the navigation of confusing theories
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
epitomises academic rigour and integrity
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.