The Constitution of Knowledge
A Defense of Truth
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Audible Standard 30-day free trial
Buy Now for £15.40
-
Narrated by:
-
Traber Burns
-
By:
-
Jonathan Rauch
About this listen
Arming Americans to defend the truth from today’s war on facts.
Disinformation. Trolling. Conspiracies. Social media pile-ons. Campus intolerance. On the surface, these recent additions to our daily vocabulary appear to have little in common. But together, they are driving an epistemic crisis: a multifront challenge to America’s ability to distinguish fact from fiction and elevate truth above falsehood.
In 2016, Russian trolls and bots nearly drowned the truth in a flood of fake news and conspiracy theories, and Donald Trump and his troll armies continued to do the same. Social media companies struggled to keep up with a flood of falsehoods and too often didn’t even seem to try. Experts and some public officials began wondering if society was losing its grip on truth itself. Meanwhile, another new phenomenon appeared: “cancel culture”. At the push of a button, those armed with a cellphone could gang up by the thousands on anyone who ran afoul of their sanctimony.
In this pathbreaking book, Jonathan Rauch reaches back to the parallel 18th-century developments of liberal democracy and science to explain what he calls the “Constitution of Knowledge” - our social system for turning disagreement into truth.
By explicating the Constitution of Knowledge and probing the war on reality, Rauch arms defenders of truth with a clearer understanding of what they must protect, why they must do - and how they can do it. His book is a sweeping and listenable description of how every American can help defend objective truth and free inquiry from threats as far away as Russia and as close as the cellphone.
©2021 Jonathan Rauch (P)2021 Blackstone PublishingEssential
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
How to steer our course back to objective truth
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Outstanding material, reader is a bit intense
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Jonathan Rauch’s “The Constitution of Knowledge” is book that tries to address the fundamental question – what is knowledge? When does something become “knowledge”? What are the determinants, the characteristics, and also, the pitfalls in this process.
One major danger rises from populism, particularly on the political right. This type of movement offers confidence and simplicity, rejecting the complexity and constant testing that genuine understanding and knowledge demands. Its leaders often aim to dismantle public belief in independent record-keepers and analysts. Simultaneously, growing intolerance on the cultural left has produced its own chilling effects. Some progressive circles now value emotional safety or consensus above exploration or disagreement. University campuses have made for telling examples of desires to exclude rather than engage with disputed speakers, reinforcing group agreement rather than debate — an outcome that runs counter to the open contest of concepts that sustains discovery.
Rauch’s reflection describes how learning and discovery rely on cooperation, civility, and public accountability. The process functions like scientific study: any notion must survive open testing by peers, and no single figure may hold final control. Professional customs such as cross-checking sources, offering response chances, and correcting missteps safeguard this system. These behaviours over time are institutionalized, thus making for an environment conducive to the advancement of knowledge. These ideas, formed slowly from centuries of refinement—shaped by ideas of civic freedom and rational inquiry passed down from European thinkers and American builders alike, built the pursuit of “shared certainty”, aka knowledge. This is worth remembering at a time of unusual distrust and fragility, demanding continual defense from those who value independent reasoning.
Thoughtprovoking
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Required reading
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.