The Constitution of Knowledge cover art

The Constitution of Knowledge

A Defense of Truth

Preview

Audible Standard 30-day free trial

Try Standard free
Select 1 audiobook a month from our entire collection.
Listen to your selected audiobooks as long as you're a member.
Get unlimited access to bingeable podcasts.
Standard auto renews for £5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

The Constitution of Knowledge

By: Jonathan Rauch
Narrated by: Traber Burns
Try Standard free

£5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for £15.40

Buy Now for £15.40

About this listen

Arming Americans to defend the truth from today’s war on facts.

Disinformation. Trolling. Conspiracies. Social media pile-ons. Campus intolerance. On the surface, these recent additions to our daily vocabulary appear to have little in common. But together, they are driving an epistemic crisis: a multifront challenge to America’s ability to distinguish fact from fiction and elevate truth above falsehood.

In 2016, Russian trolls and bots nearly drowned the truth in a flood of fake news and conspiracy theories, and Donald Trump and his troll armies continued to do the same. Social media companies struggled to keep up with a flood of falsehoods and too often didn’t even seem to try. Experts and some public officials began wondering if society was losing its grip on truth itself. Meanwhile, another new phenomenon appeared: “cancel culture”. At the push of a button, those armed with a cellphone could gang up by the thousands on anyone who ran afoul of their sanctimony.

In this pathbreaking book, Jonathan Rauch reaches back to the parallel 18th-century developments of liberal democracy and science to explain what he calls the “Constitution of Knowledge” - our social system for turning disagreement into truth.

By explicating the Constitution of Knowledge and probing the war on reality, Rauch arms defenders of truth with a clearer understanding of what they must protect, why they must do - and how they can do it. His book is a sweeping and listenable description of how every American can help defend objective truth and free inquiry from threats as far away as Russia and as close as the cellphone.

©2021 Jonathan Rauch (P)2021 Blackstone Publishing
Civics & Citizenship Elections & Political Process Politics & Government Russia Natural Disaster Fantasy War Constitutional Law
All stars
Most relevant
Super valuable. Feels like he makes as big a step forward as Karl Popper did.

Essential

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Brimming with insights, this must be the most perceptive account of what's gone wrong in our knowledge economy recently, what's been going right for a long time, and how to steer our course back to objective truth. Rauch articulates what I suspect many of us have felt but have been barely able to put into words. He offers a synthesis of the ideas of many thinkers, from Karl Popper to James Madison, and then reaches a little further yet than has been done before.

How to steer our course back to objective truth

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

This book is fantastic and essential reading for living in todays Information Age. The reader is fine I would have rather Jonathan Rauch read it as it would seem less “performative”.

Outstanding material, reader is a bit intense

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

“Alternative facts”. “Truths” that change hourly, and are broadcast on, what else, Truth Social. “Critical theory”. “Cancel culture”. In the 24/7 media world o today, with its victimhood driven narratives and suspicion of moderate views , at times its hard to know what is true and what is not. Entertainment-based reporting, featuring exaggerated talk shows and opinion-based broadcasts, was already distorting public understanding long before Twitter or Facebook rose. However, the arrival of digital platforms has amplified the chaos, loosening the credibility of reliable outlets
Jonathan Rauch’s “The Constitution of Knowledge” is book that tries to address the fundamental question – what is knowledge? When does something become “knowledge”? What are the determinants, the characteristics, and also, the pitfalls in this process.
One major danger rises from populism, particularly on the political right. This type of movement offers confidence and simplicity, rejecting the complexity and constant testing that genuine understanding and knowledge demands. Its leaders often aim to dismantle public belief in independent record-keepers and analysts. Simultaneously, growing intolerance on the cultural left has produced its own chilling effects. Some progressive circles now value emotional safety or consensus above exploration or disagreement. University campuses have made for telling examples of desires to exclude rather than engage with disputed speakers, reinforcing group agreement rather than debate — an outcome that runs counter to the open contest of concepts that sustains discovery.
Rauch’s reflection describes how learning and discovery rely on cooperation, civility, and public accountability. The process functions like scientific study: any notion must survive open testing by peers, and no single figure may hold final control. Professional customs such as cross-checking sources, offering response chances, and correcting missteps safeguard this system. These behaviours over time are institutionalized, thus making for an environment conducive to the advancement of knowledge. These ideas, formed slowly from centuries of refinement—shaped by ideas of civic freedom and rational inquiry passed down from European thinkers and American builders alike, built the pursuit of “shared certainty”, aka knowledge. This is worth remembering at a time of unusual distrust and fragility, demanding continual defense from those who value independent reasoning.

Thoughtprovoking

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Very balanced 8n content... offering hopeful insights. One criticism would be the examples (other than those directly aimed at problems with left leaning ideology) were predominantly instances relating to right political ideology.

Required reading

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

See more reviews