The Lost World of the Torah
Law as Covenant and Wisdom in Ancient Context
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Audible Standard 30-day free trial
Buy Now for £13.58
-
Narrated by:
-
Tom Parks
About this listen
Our handling of what we call biblical law veers between controversy and neglect. On the one hand, controversy arises when Old Testament laws seem either odd beyond comprehension (not eating lobster) or positively reprehensible (executing children). On the other, neglect results when we consider the law obsolete, no longer carrying any normative power. Even those who do attempt to make use of the Old Testament "law" often find it either irrelevant, hopelessly laden with "thou shalt nots," or simply confusing. Despite these extremes, people continue to propose moral principles from these laws as "the biblical view" and to garner proof texts to resolve issues that arise in society. The result is that both Christians and skeptics regularly abuse the Torah, and its true message often lies unheard.
Walton and Walton offer in The Lost World of the Torah a restorative vision of the ancient genre of instruction for wisdom that makes up a significant portion of the Old Testament. In the ancient Near East, order was achieved through the wisdom of those who governed society. The objective of torah was to teach the Israelites to be wise about the kind of order needed to receive the blessings of God's favor and presence within the context of the covenant. Here listeners will find fresh insight on this fundamental genre of the Old Testament canon.
©2019 John H. Walton, J. Harvey Walton (P)2021 eChristianConcept changing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This is a nonsensical dichotomy.
Firstly the term “covenant” is an agreement which itself has legal ramifications.
Secondly, those who broke the covenant of the Torah were punished with legal force.
It’s doubtful that any of the people being stoned, burned by fire or swallowed up by the ground pleaded with the argument… “but it’s a covenant not a law”.
Thirdly, Jesus himself said not one part of the law would pass away.
The New Testament is clear that Jesus came to fulfil this.
Diminishing the law diminishes the requirment for Jesus, for salvation by Jesus, for faith in Jesus… because if it’s only a situational covenant then God can provide a different covenant for different people.
Clearly, the bible says there is only one way by which anyone can be saved…. but this is not true if the law is not actually law… because then no-one needs to be saved from judgment.
The Torah might be doctrine and not modern western law… but the implications were and are legal.
It also misunderstands that most laws are also in this sense covenantal between rulers or governmnents and their people.
There is one throwaway line that is strongly suggestive of the implications that the authors want you to believe.
A reference that certain statements in Leviticus (alluded to but not specified) are only contextual and therefore not a basis for God’s judgment.
It seems the implication the authors wish to make is that the Law is not law … so no-one needs to believe that anything is the standard by which all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.
There may be some “interesting points” in this book but… if the word Torah means doctrine then the authors seem to deviate from the clear doctrine of the Torah.
At best this book is the result of academic obtuseness… saying that a house can’t possibly have a foundation… because there is a window with a view of the horizon.
At best it’s incoherent nonsense…
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.