A Pause for Thought on SNA Allocations
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Summary
In this episode of If I were the Minister for Education, I break down what happened after projected SNA allocations for the 2026/27 school year showed roughly 200 schools set to lose at least one Special Needs Assistant: not due to cuts or clerical error, but because of how the national redistribution model works under a capped total.
I explain the background to the current situation, including the long period where schools largely held on to allocations since around 2017, the return of NCSE-led reviews from 2023 onward, and how this year’s broader round of reviews led to some schools being told they had more SNAs than the model allowed.
I talk through the predictable political cycle that followed: schools and parents mobilised, pressure built, the Minister “paused” the process, additional funding was announced (€19 million), and the government confirmed no school would lose an SNA this year. While I’m relieved for schools, principals and SNAs facing uncertainty, I argue that pausing-and-funding responses don’t fix the underlying pattern and that we’re likely to repeat the same crisis again.
I also say I feel sorry for the NCSE in this instance because they became the visible face of a policy they were implementing, and I argue the real issue sits higher up the chain. I then outline what I see as the structural problem: Ireland’s primary schools are publicly funded but privately managed individual entities competing for enrolment, staff and survival, while staffing supports (SNA posts and SET hours) are allocated through a national, projection-based redistribution model. I describe how redistribution creates concentrated losers and dispersed winners, making it politically fragile, and I connect this to the annual “cluster games” around SET allocations.
Finally, I set out the kind of structural change I think is needed: moving away from competition as the organising principle by exploring regional employment and local coordination through education authorities, because I don’t believe repeated annual firefighting counts as planning. I also reference additional writing and commentary, including an Irish Independent piece by Fionnan Sheahan and analysis by Ciara Reilly, and I point listeners toward my Substack articles for more.
00:00 Welcome and Subscribe
00:47 SNA Allocations Fallout
02:30 How the SNA Model Works
04:28 From Freeze to Reviews
07:59 Backlash and the Pause
09:11 Predictable Crisis Cycle
10:03 Relief and Real Stakes
12:19 Why NCSE Took the Heat
14:06 Schools Compete to Survive
17:09 Redistribution vs Competition
18:25 SET Cluster Games Parallel
22:42 Politics and Concentrated Anger
29:29 What Would Actually Change
33:16 Final Thoughts and Goodbye
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit simonmlewis.substack.com/subscribe