AI Monetization cover art

AI Monetization

AI Monetization

By: Maciej Wilczynski Ph.D.
Listen for free

Raw, unfiltered notes on pricing, monetization, and value of AI products. From pricing expert, Maciej Wilczynski, Ph.D., from Valueships. Perfect for product creators, software entrepreneurs, and everyone who needs to speed up their monetization game. Topics include: token economics, outcome-based pricing, migrations from subscription to usage-based - the mechanics nobody tells you about. Solo-engineered on my own, always keeping it below 20 minutes. New episodes every week.Valueships Economics Marketing Marketing & Sales
Episodes
  • evolution of AI metrics - how to pick one

    evolution of AI metrics - how to pick one
    Jul 1 2026
    evolution of AI metrics - AI Monetization · episode #2software pricing has changed shape seven times in 60 years, each shift happened because the previous model stopped capturing the value of the new technology. we're mid-way through shift number seven right now, and most vendors are picking the wrong metric for the wrong reasons.the short version tl;dr: consumption-based pricing is the current market default for AI. it's also the second-best model, and while outcome-based pricing is the right answer, but it requires solving attribution.and honestly, the attribution is the hardest unsolved problem in AI monetization, and we're focusing so much on that!all insights are mine, no AI slop, even though I am talking about LLMs and stuff - even this description is manually edited, crafted, and polished by myself - o tempora o mores, where we are as a world we actually need to say it...this episode walks through the whole history of software metrics, but with a twist on which metrics to actually pick and when:the seven pricing shifts, from mainframe hourly rates to outcome-based agentswhy per-license pricing worked in the PC era and broke when cloud hitthe birth of SaaS tiers and how "customer success" became a job titleseat-based pricing as the accidental default that lasted 20 yearsusage-based pricing and value metric picking (messages, mentions, keywords)why AI vendors reached for consumption pricing first - and of course why customers accepted ittoken-based pricing and the margin exposure problem when model costs drop 80% a yearoutput-based vs outcome-based: they're not the same thing, and you should kniow it!resolution pricing at Intercom, recovery pricing at Chargeflow - few examples I believe should be hereattribution as the wall every outcome-based startup eventually hitspick second best hypothesis: why software always picks the workable model first and the right one lateraconcrete framework for choosing your pricing metric in 2026solo-engineered by Maciej Wilczynski, Ph.D., Managing Partner at Valueships, always below 20 minutes.---------timestamps00:00 intro — the pricing question every AI founder is asking 01:30 mainframe hourly rates: the original usage model 03:10 PC era and per-license pricing 04:30 cloud computing and the birth of SaaS tiers05:30 how subscriptions created "customer success" as a function 06:30 seat-based pricing and the value metric era 08:00 why AI reached for consumption pricing first 09:10 the token cost problem: 80% price drops don't mean 80% price cuts 10:30 output-based pricing and the mid-tier compromise 11:30 outcome-based examples: Intercom, Chargeflow13:00 the attribution wall - how to overcome it in a right way15:00 second best hypothesis: why software adopts workable before right 16:30 consumption as the current default 17:30 where outcome-based pricing actually works today 18:50 how to pick your metric in 2026---------key takeaways:consumption pricing is the market's current answer, but not because it's the best model. simply it's the one that is actually managable, vendors can implement it, customers can accept it, procurement doesn't fully hate it, so it's a trade-off no one really wants, but that's the ad reality.token-based pricing has a margin problem, which will be a problem in the future. foundation model costs are dropping 60-80% per year. to put in perspective: if you priced your product on 2024 token economics and customers now expect that pricing to hold, you're either eating margin compression or renegotiating downstream - both are bad.outcome-based pricing is the future, but only where attribution is clean. Chargeflow can price on recovered chargebacks because every recovered dollar is measurable and directly attributable, while Intercom charges for resolution - only when you have clear, clear attribution you can actually get it right. outcome-based pricing doesn't work in broad use-cases.second best hypothesis: software always picks the workable model first, not the right one. SaaS didn't launch with per-outcome pricing, but with per-seat because that was the easy operational model. same story now: consumption before outcome, because consumption is what founders can ship and customers can budget for.---------for your own product in 2026, the framework is:dollarize the value - if you can't put a specific dollar figure on what your AI delivers per user, you can't price on outcomes yetsolve attribution - can you draw a straight line from your product's action to the customer's business result?assign ownership - who at the customer's org owns the outcome and can approve the pricingshow confidence intervals - customers accept outcome pricing when you can predict impact with a range, not a single numberprotect your margin - model costs will keep dropping; your pricing structure needs to survive thata) If you can hit all five, price on outcomes and charge premiumb) If you can hit three, price on outputs and charge fair. c) If you can hit fewer...
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • is there enough value in AI to justify price increase?

    is there enough value in AI to justify price increase?
    Jun 24 2026

    i have read 67 reports from top institutions, so you don't have to. I had one mission in mind: does AI really increase value enough to justify price increases?

    went through what Goldman, McKinsey, MIT, Stanford, and Acemoglu have to say about AI productivity gains and also considered what it means for pricing. short version: AI bolted onto existing processes caps at 15-30% productivity gain.

    that's not enough for a pricing premium. you need to rebuild your work around AI as Henry Ford did. This is the way to unlock real value.

    also mapped out 5 situations where AI actually justifies a price premium.

    keeping it short under 20 minutes, I value your time.

    whole report I quote is here, without any e-mails or login: https://www.valueships.com/artifacts/the-real-economic-value-of-ai

    timeframe:

    • 00:00 intro
    • 00:28 67 reports on AI productivity ceiling
    • 02:13 the Henry Ford parallel - you need to make your own workflow
    • 03:13 theory of constraints vs. AI
    • 04:26 the Artificial Value Index - how it works
    • 05:30 MIT study on how most pilots fail
    • 06:01 the pricing model mismatch
    • 07:47 why customers stick to old purchasing models
    • 10:08 five situations where AI justifies a premium - good checklist to follow
    • 13:13 cost vs revenue framing
    • 14:13 closing - AI is the anchor, not the keynote


    Maciej Wilczynski, Ph.D.
    Managing Partner, Valueships
    Show More Show Less
    15 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet