Andrew Miles Davis covers a week of AI news that stretches from the Florida attorney general launching a criminal investigation into OpenAI following a mass shooting to Meta installing tracking software on all corporate laptops with no opt-out option and factoring AI usage into staff performance reviews. He also covers the Cannes Film Festival opening its doors to AI production workflows for the first time, actors discovering their faces being placed into fabricated sexual scenes in AI-generated ads without their consent, a survey finding that 55 percent of Gen Z and millennial adults identify as AI sexual, and a repeat of the Sprout Social finding that unlabelled AI content has now become the number one brand trust issue on social media. The accountability question running through all of it is the same one Andrew has been raising in his Good Bad Ugly sessions, when something goes wrong, who is responsible. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for the AI news that matters, every Friday in ten minutes.

Andrew Miles Davis breaks down a study published by Anthropic analysing over one million Claude conversations from March to April 2026, focusing on what it reveals about how people are actually using AI and why the findings carry real implications for marketers, brands, and individuals. He covers the shift from AI as search engine to AI as thinking partner, the uncomfortable finding that Claude showed excessive agreement in nearly one in ten of all personal guidance conversations and in one in four relationship conversations, and what that means for anyone relying on AI to challenge their thinking rather than validate it. He also picks up on the study's implications for brand visibility, arguing that the new version of SEO is about how AI describes you when a consumer asks which company or product to choose, making brand context and AI training a competitive advantage rather than a nice to have. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for daily ten-minute episodes that go beyond the headlines and into what AI research actually means for the way you work.

Andrew Miles Davis answers three questions from recent training sessions, starting with the one he gets asked most often across every workshop he delivers, whether the free AI plan is genuinely enough or whether the monthly subscription is worth it. His answer is direct and comes with no commercial interest behind it. He also revisits the jobs question with a different angle, arguing that the more interesting territory is not what AI cannot do but what people will still choose a human for even when AI can technically do it just as well. The final question comes from a recent vibe coding session, covering whether to do all your planning and prompting inside a tool like Google AI Studio or to use a large language model first, and why the answer has a real financial implication if you are paying per credit. Subscribe to In AI Nutshell for daily ten-minute episodes built around the questions real people are asking about AI right now.