Jen, Gabe & Chewy cover art

Jen, Gabe & Chewy

Jen, Gabe & Chewy

By: Wisconsin On Demand
Listen for free

About this listen

ESPN reporter Jen Lada teams up with Packers Hall of Famer Mark Chmura and longtime ESPN Milwaukee host Gabe Neitzel as they provide unique and raw perspectives on local and national sports headlines.2024, Good Karma Brands, LLC Baseball & Softball Basketball Football (American) Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Matt LaFleur Says ‘Start Over’ — Are the Packers Coaching Staff Failing Jordan Love?
    Mar 31 2026
    The Green Bay Packers are hitting reset… but should they be? In this episode of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the crew reacts to Matt LaFleur’s surprising comments at NFL league meetings, where he said the Packers offense needs to: 👉 “Strip everything down and start like it’s Year One again” 🧠 WHAT DOES THAT ACTUALLY MEAN? Is this: A necessary reset for a young offense? Or a major red flag about coaching and development? Chewy doesn’t hold back: “If you have to strip it down after eight years… that’s a failure of coaches.” 🚨 THE BIG ISSUE: PLAYERS NOT ON THE SAME PAGE The discussion centers around a core problem: Players missing assignments Offensive breakdowns caused by ONE mistake Confusion across: Offensive line Wide receivers Roles and responsibilities 👉 “One guy messes up… the whole play blows up.” 🏈 JORDAN LOVE QUESTION This is supposed to be the year Jordan Love takes the next step. So why are the Packers: Simplifying the offense? Pulling things BACK instead of expanding? That contradiction is the heart of this episode. ⚠️ IS THIS ON PLAYERS… OR COACHING? The debate gets real: Argument 1: Young team → simplify → rebuild foundation Argument 2 (Chewy): If players don’t know the system by now… 👉 “That’s on coaching.” 🔄 OFFENSIVE LINE CHAOS The episode highlights a HUGE issue: Constant position shuffling Guards playing tackle Tackles playing guard Centers with little experience 👉 “You had guys playing positions they’ve never played before” 📉 ROLE CLARITY PROBLEM Another key takeaway: Players didn’t fully understand their roles Coaches may not have defined them clearly Leads to freelancing, confusion, and breakdowns 🧩 WHAT SHOULD THE PACKERS BE DOING? Instead of resetting, the expectation was: Build on previous years Expand the offense Let Jordan Love take control But instead… 👉 They’re going BACKWARD before going forward 🎯 CORE QUESTION Is this: Smart coaching adjustment? OR Proof the Packers offense isn’t developing correctly?
    Show More Show Less
    54 mins
  • Brewers Shock Move: Cooper Pratt’s $51M Deal Signals BIG Changes at Shortstop
    Mar 31 2026
    The Milwaukee Brewers just made one of their most surprising financial moves in recent memory — and it could reshape the future of the franchise. In this episode of Jen, Gabe & Chewy, the crew breaks down the reported 8-year, $51 million deal for 21-year-old shortstop prospect Cooper Pratt — a player who hasn’t even reached Triple-A yet. 💰 WHY THIS DEAL IS TURNING HEADS Pratt hasn’t played above Double-A Brewers rarely spend early like this Includes two option years (~$15M each) Real core deal = 6 years, ~$20M 👉 Translation: This is a calculated gamble — not a reckless one ⚾ WHAT THIS MEANS FOR THE BREWERS This move signals something BIG: The Brewers may view Cooper Pratt as the future shortstop Raises major questions about: Jesús Made Joey Ortiz Other infield depth pieces 💬 “You can only have one shortstop… so who’s moving?” 🔄 BREWERS STRATEGY: DEVELOP OR DEAL? Milwaukee is leaning into what they do best: Identify talent early Lock players in BEFORE they hit the big money tier Build sustainable success without huge payroll spending 👉 “This is kind of the way they HAVE to do it” 🧠 TIMELINE: WHEN WILL PRATT ARRIVE? Despite the contract: No immediate call-up expected Still likely spending time in the minors But… 👀 A debut sometime THIS season isn’t out of the question 🔥 THE BIGGER PICTURE This isn’t just about Cooper Pratt. It’s about: The Brewers’ long-term roster construction Their financial philosophy And whether this move signals a shift toward more aggressive talent investment 🎯 KEY QUESTION 👉 Is this a smart small-market move… or a rare gamble that could backfire?
    Show More Show Less
    38 mins
  • LIVE REACT: Brewers STUN with 6-Run Comeback | Are the Packers Better or Just Banking?
    Mar 30 2026
    The Brewers just pulled off a STUNNER… and the Packers are full of questions. ⚾🧀🔥 👉 The Milwaukee Brewers storm back from down 7-2 with a 6-run 8th inning, capped by a MASSIVE Christian Yelich home run. Was this just one game… or a sign this team is built to compete all season? ⚾ Brewers Comeback Breakdown Down big early… never quit Yelich delivers a huge moment Balanced lineup wearing down pitchers Are the Brewers deeper than national media thinks? This is the kind of win that matters over 162 games. 🧀 Packers: Better… or Just “Banking”? Meanwhile in Green Bay: 👉 Are the Packers actually improved? 👉 Or are they just banking on development? We break down: Loss of key snaps vs replacing “good” players Why the offseason wasn’t flashy — but might be effective Javon Hargrave’s impact on the defense Whether this team is truly top-tier in the NFC 🧠 Big Questions Facing Green Bay Can Jordan Love make the jump from good → great? Is the offensive line a real concern? Are the Packers relying too much on young players? Is this team actually close… or still missing something? 🔥 We’ll cover: ⚾ Brewers comeback and season outlook 💥 Yelich’s impact and lineup depth 🏈 Packers offseason strategy and roster changes 📉 Offensive line concerns and question marks 📈 Where Green Bay ranks in the NFC 💬 Live fan reactions and debate 💬 Join the conversation ➡️ Are the Brewers legit contenders? ➡️ Was that comeback a sign of something bigger? ➡️ Are the Packers better — or just hoping they are? ➡️ What worries you most about this team? Drop your takes in the chat — we react LIVE. 📲 Hashtags #Brewers #MilwaukeeBrewers #ChristianYelich #Packers #GreenBayPackers #JordanLove #WisconsinSports #SportsTalk #MLB #NFL2026 #LiveReaction #ESPNWisconsin
    Show More Show Less
    52 mins
No reviews yet