• Why Did An ISP Trooper Get Shut Down When He Flagged A Delphi Suspect?
    May 31 2026


    According to the defense's appellate filings, an ISP Trooper found "concerning similarity" between the Delphi murders and a suspect who had been flagged repeatedly by tipsters for posting images of dead girls with sticks over their bodies on social media. He pushed for further investigation. His superiors said no.

    This same suspect, according to the filings, sat across from investigators four days after the murders and admitted to practicing pagan rituals involving bloodletting. He owned a .40 caliber firearm — the same caliber as the round recovered at the crime scene. They recorded his interview. The Delphi Police erased the tape. They never collected the gun. When officers went to verify his alibi, his employer offered surveillance footage. They declined to review it and marked him cleared. In 2018, he allegedly created a painting of Odin hanging upside down — right leg tucked behind the left — matching how one victim was positioned at the scene. His associate, a self-described pagan religious leader who reportedly knew the murder woods "very well," had his interview go unrecorded. His alibi wasn't checked for six years. Neither man has been charged.

    The jury that convicted Richard Allen heard none of this. The defense argued it should have been admitted as third-party suspect evidence. The trial court excluded it.

    On the other side of the appeal is the document that started the case against Allen. Detective Liggett's probable cause affidavit allegedly misrepresented witness descriptions to connect Allen to Bridge Guy. Betsy Blair described a young man in his twenties with poofy brown hair — not a 44-year-old with a crew cut. The defense says those physical details were omitted while her jacket description was kept. Blair reportedly told Liggett these were two different men. Without this warrant, the defense argues, there's no search, no gun, no bullet, no arrest, no confessions. A Franks hearing to challenge the warrant was denied. An appellate court will now decide whether the exclusions and the omissions matter enough to change the outcome.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #ISP #Odinism #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #DelphiInvestigation #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby

    Show More Show Less
    39 mins
  • Why Did The Kouri Richins Investigation Stall Until A PI Stepped In?
    May 30 2026


    Deputy Jayme Woody acknowledged on the stand that the criminal investigation into Eric Richins' death had stalled by fall 2022. Meanwhile, Todd Gabler — a private investigator with 34 years exclusively on the defense side — was already ahead of the people with badges.

    Gabler had identified the woman prosecutors say sourced the fentanyl. He'd flagged her criminal history. He was handing evidence to the Sheriff's Office that they didn't have. He searched the Richins home for days after law enforcement released the scene, documented everything with body cameras, and found material the initial search missed. When he tipped a detective about when to interview a key figure — because she was failing drug tests in court — he was restarting an investigation that had gone cold.

    The gap between Gabler's investigation and law enforcement's is a story about what happens when a family refuses to accept silence as an answer. Eric Richins' family made that call. What Gabler found justified every dollar they spent.

    The financial motive that emerged at trial made the case devastating. Kouri Richins owed $7.5 million. Her forensic accountant called it an implosion — 236 bounced checks, fifteen failed renovations, a business bleeding out. Eric was meeting with divorce attorneys, building a secret trust to protect their sons, stripping Kouri from his will and insurance. Her prenup meant the only profitable way out was his death.

    She secretly took out $1.9 million in life insurance on Eric without his knowledge. She texted her housekeeper about "the Michael Jackson stuff." She was texting Robert Josh Grossmann about marriage while still married to Eric. Prosecutors presented an alleged escalation — Greece, Valentine's Day, and a final cocktail with five times the lethal dose of fentanyl. Eric told friends his wife was trying to end his life. Two weeks later he was dead. The jury needed less than three hours.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #FentanylPoisoning #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #InsuranceFraud #MoscowMule #JusticeForEric

    Show More Show Less
    57 mins
  • Was The Nancy Guthrie Investigation Ever Set Up To Succeed?
    May 30 2026

    An 84-year-old woman allegedly stolen from her own bed in the middle of the night — and almost immediately, the investigation meant to find her started falling apart from the inside.

    The crime scene was released too early. A thermal imaging plane sat grounded because its pilot had been reassigned over a personal grudge. The lead sergeant on the initial response reportedly had no homicide experience. Experienced detectives had already been sidelined. The doorbell camera footage? The sheriff's department declared it unrecoverable. The FBI produced it roughly ten days later. Sheriff Nanos told the public Nancy had been abducted, then walked it back the next day. When reporters pressed the contradiction, he said he wasn't used to being held accountable for what he says.

    Jennifer Coffindaffer has seen investigations succeed despite early mistakes and investigations collapse because of them. She breaks down every documented failure in this case and asks the question the people of Pima County deserve answered: if someone is eventually charged, can a prosecution survive this many investigative problems?

    The evidence that exists is significant. Unknown DNA from an unidentified contributor recovered from inside Nancy's home. Thousands of hours of surveillance footage from cameras across Tucson. A white truck and red sedan reported near the property. Cellphone activity data from the area. Coffindaffer walks through both evidence paths — where the DNA stands, whether it's been uploaded to CODIS, what happens if the contributor isn't in the system, why the lab routing through multiple facilities instead of Quantico may be costing time. Then the digital mountain — how vehicle timeline reconstruction and footage cataloging actually work inside a multi-agency investigation, and why she believes this route may name a suspect first.

    Nancy Guthrie's family is still offering a $1 million reward. They've been cleared by law enforcement. They've been targeted online by creators who allegedly built audiences off false accusations. Coffindaffer offers an honest read on whether the sheriff's repeated claim that the case is "getting closer" reflects real progress or the kind of language that fills space when nothing concrete exists.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #TucsonArizona #MissingPerson

    Show More Show Less
    40 mins
  • What Does It Mean When The FBI Takes Over Communication With Nancy Guthrie's Family?
    May 30 2026


    In 28 years at the FBI, Jennifer Coffindaffer has seen what happens between local sheriffs and the Bureau when an investigation is running well — and what happens when something has broken down. The communication shift in the Nancy Guthrie case tells her something specific.

    Sheriff Chris Nanos confirmed he's no longer speaking directly with Nancy Guthrie's family. The FBI is now the sole point of contact. That transition — in a case where an 84-year-old woman has been missing for over three months with blood on her porch, doorbell footage of a masked armed figure, and no arrest — is not a routine procedural adjustment. Did the family cut him off? Did he step back? And what does it signal about who is actually running this investigation?

    Coffindaffer walks through the operational dynamics — what trust between agencies looks like when it exists and what it looks like when it doesn't. The FBI Director publicly stated his agency was locked out for four days. The sheriff says they were there from the start. Those statements cannot both be true. The crime scene was allegedly released early. A sergeant without homicide experience was reportedly assigned to lead the case. Nancy's pacemaker disconnected in the early morning hours. She left behind everything she'd need to survive.

    The family has been cleared by law enforcement. They've offered a $1 million reward. They've been targeted online by content creators who allegedly built audiences off accusations they fabricated. Media outlets gave platforms to hoax ransom demands that may have damaged the active investigation.

    Eric Faddis examines the family's legal options — against the content creators, the county, and the outlets. He addresses whether this case can be taken from the sheriff's hands and what Arizona's victim rights laws reportedly guarantee a family in this position. Coffindaffer addresses Nanos's claim that the case is "getting closer" and what would have to be happening behind the scenes to support it.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #JenniferCoffindaffer #Eric

    Show More Show Less
    33 mins
  • Why Did A Career Defense Investigator Start Building The Case Against Kouri Richins?
    May 30 2026


    Todd Gabler had spent 34 years working one side of the courtroom — every case for the defense. Then Eric Richins' family called about a civil matter and the phone records pulled in the first few weeks made staying in that lane impossible.

    Constant contact between Kouri Richins and a housekeeper with a criminal record and active drug court failures — in the months surrounding Eric's death. Law enforcement hadn't reached those records yet. Gabler flagged the pattern and kept going. Nearly 50 interviews. Multiple vehicles tracked. A body of evidence assembled that would eventually help break open a criminal investigation that had stalled. The behavioral question is what drives a career defense investigator to cross the line he's worked behind for three decades — and the answer is in what the records showed him.

    This is the first time Gabler has sat down to walk through the beginning of this case publicly — the call, the records, the moment the direction became clear. A conversation nobody else has had with the man who was inside this investigation before any charges were filed.

    That investigation ended with a conviction. What came after didn't end. Before sentencing, Kouri wrote a message that prosecutors filed with the court: "They picked the wrong one." "They haven't seen anything yet." She allegedly wrote a letter from jail instructing her brother to testify falsely. She's accused of witness intimidation. Her own thirteen-year-old told the court he's afraid she'll come for him if she's ever released.

    Eric Faddis walks through what someone serving life without parole can still do from behind bars — the mail, the calls, the proxies — and the legal tools available to protect the Richins family. No-contact orders, protective orders, corrections restrictions. Each addresses a different vector. Faddis identifies which gaps remain even when all of them are in place. Kouri Richins is locked up. The threat she represents hasn't been.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ToddGabler #LifeWithoutParole #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #WitnessIntimidation #JusticeForEric

    Show More Show Less
    46 mins
  • Kepner, Adelson, Birchmore: Why Does The System Keep Failing?
    May 29 2026

    What does it take for the justice system to actually hold someone — and why does that bar seem to move from case to case? We put three of the most talked-about cases in true crime in front of a defense attorney and former prosecutor and asked him to connect them.

    In Anna Kepner's case, our guest explains how a judge can concede that an adult would be jailed and still leave a young defendant free, and what the conditions of that release really require. In the Dan Markel case, he breaks down why two people the state has openly called co-conspirators — Wendi and Harvey Adelson — have never been charged, what limited immunity protects, and how hard it is to prove someone lied about what they knew. And in the Sandra Birchmore case, he reads the meaning of a rare reversal on a death certificate, a bail denial built on evidence a judge called very strong, if not overwhelming, and a defense that keeps losing.

    Taken together, these cases are a master class in the distance between suspicion and accountability. Our guest offers the experienced, both-sides-of-the-aisle analysis that explains not just what happened, but why each one broke the way it did — and which accused he believes is most likely to walk.


    Links:

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod


    Disclaimer:

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.


    Hashtags:

    #AnnaKepner #WendiAdelson #SandraBirchmore #DanMarkel #MatthewFarwell #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #CriminalJustice #DefenseAttorney #CrimeCommentary

    Show More Show Less
    55 mins
  • What Was Todd Gabler Finding While Police Were Doing Nothing on the Kouri Richins Case?
    May 29 2026

    The Sheriff's Office investigation stalled. Todd Gabler's didn't. While law enforcement sat on a case that wasn't moving, Gabler was the one pulling phone records before they knew where to look. He was the one tracking vehicles while the investigation gathered dust. He was the one searching the home for days after police released it. And he did all of it while operating under rules that gave him access a detective would need a judge to get.

    In this complete three-part interview, Gabler holds nothing back. He tells Tony Brueski how a civil assignment for Eric Richins' family became the investigation that changed his career. How billing records exposed the connection between Kouri and her housekeeper during the exact months the case hinges on. What the defense got wrong about his methods and his motives. What it meant to the Richins family when the case finally moved toward charges. And what it cost him personally — the surgery, the stand, the verdict, and the question of whether a case like this ever lets you walk away clean.

    This is the investigation behind the conviction — start to finish — from the only person who was there for every piece of it.

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    #KouriRichins #ToddGabler #EricRichins #TrueCrime #FentanylPoisoning #PrivateInvestigator #HiddenKillers #UtahMurderTrial #CarmenLauber #TrueCrimePodcast

    Show More Show Less
    58 mins
  • Is Farwell's Defense Already Losing The Birchmore Case?
    May 29 2026

    When a defense team loses every major motion before trial even starts, what does that tell you about where the case is headed? In the prosecution of former Stoughton officer Matthew Farwell, we asked an attorney and legal analyst to read the signs.

    Sandra Birchmore, twenty-three and pregnant, was found dead in 2021 in a death first ruled a suicide. Prosecutors say Farwell killed her and staged it, to cover up a relationship they allege began when she was a teenager. The defense built its case on that original suicide finding — and then the state amended the death certificate to undetermined, a reversal experts describe as exceptionally rare.

    Our guest breaks down the strategy questions that matter. What goes through a defense team's mind when the foundation of its theory disappears months before trial? When the motion to dismiss, the venue change, and the bail request have all failed, at what point does a defense stop trying to win pretrial and start building a record for appeal? How does a jury full of people who live on their phones absorb evidence about a sudden, total silence from someone who was always connected? And how do you recover in front of a jury when the last professional who saw her alive contradicts your entire narrative from the witness stand?

    This is the deep, measured analysis for anyone who wants to understand not just what happened, but what the defense is actually doing now — and whether any of it can work.


    Links:

    Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

    Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

    X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod


    Disclaimer:

    This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.


    Hashtags:

    #SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrime #StoughtonPolice #FederalTrial #DefenseStrategy #JusticeForSandra #MassachusettsCrime #CrimeCommentary

    Show More Show Less
    19 mins