In this episode of Signal and Noise, Brian and Andrew ditch the agenda and go full rant mode, recording from Andrew's hotel in Atlanta with no guest, no script, and no filter.

The topic is AI anxiety. Not the doom spiral variety, but the very real, day-to-day frustration of trying to stay current with a technology that moves faster than any organization can evaluate, approve, or implement. Andrew frames it as trying to build a robot underwater with one arm tied behind his back, in a wave pool, while the water keeps changing.

The conversation gets honest about what this looks like in practice, from juggling a growing personal stack of AI tools to navigating the very different constraints that come with using AI inside a company holding PII, client data, and SOC 2 compliance obligations. They land on a practical and surprisingly calming framework: stop chasing the best model and start building your processes in a model-agnostic way so your work survives the next wave of change regardless of which tool wins.

The episode ends with both hosts arriving at genuine excitement rather than dread, and an open invitation for listeners navigating the same thing to come on the show and talk through it.

Key Takeaways:

• Why AI anxiety is a real and shared experience for market research professionals right now, and why the pace of model releases makes organizational adoption feel nearly impossible to time correctly

• The case for being model agnostic and building AI workflows that do not depend on any single tool or provider, so your work survives the next wave of change

• Why the Anthropic report on AI exposure by industry means market research professionals should be excited, not threatened

If you loved the episode, have comments, or want to appear on the show, connect with us down below!

Connect with us:

• LinkedIn

• YouTube

• ROI Rocket

In this quick-hit episode of Signal and Noise, Andrew catches up with Brian fresh off the floor of SampleCon 2026, recording from the Delta Sky Club in Seattle. No studio setup, no guests, just a real-time debrief from one of the industry's most dedicated annual gatherings.

Brian shares his firsthand impressions of a conference that felt noticeably different this year. SampleCon is evolving. What once centered on panel standards and supplier partnerships is now leaning hard into technology, AI implementation, and a wave of new faces and companies that would have felt out of place at the event just a few years ago. Brian compares the vibe to a smaller IIEX, and that is not a small compliment.

The conversation covers the headline moment of the conference, a point-counterpoint keynote debate between Patrick Comer and Melanie Courtright on human versus synthetic respondents, the growing industry consensus shifting from "should we use synthetic?" to "prove to us that it works," and a standout session from Walmart's research team making a public case for better respondent care and panel investment.

Key Takeaways:

• How SampleCon is evolving from a supplier networking event into a technology and innovation conference

• What one keynote debate revealed about where the industry stands on synthetic research

• Why the conversation around AI and synthetic data has shifted from "should we?" to "prove it works"

• Why conferences held at resort-style venues create a different and arguably more productive networking environment

If you loved the episode, have comments, or want to appear on the show, connect with us down below!

Connect with us:

• LinkedIn

• YouTube

• ROI Rocket

In this episode of Signal and Noise, Brian and Andrew sit down with Lenny Murphy, one of the most recognized voices in the market research industry. As the founder of GreenBook, co-founder of the Insight Innovation Exchange (IIEX), and a Gen2 Advisors partner with deep roots in M&A and investment, Lenny brings a perspective that is equal parts historical lens and boots-on-the-ground reality.

The conversation covers the accelerating collision between artificial intelligence and the market research industry. Lenny reframes AI not as an apocalypse, but as a restructuring, drawing parallels to the printing press, the automobile, and the industrial automation of the 1980s. The discomfort is real, the displacement is real, but so is the opportunity.

The trio digs into where the industry has already been commoditized and where it went wrong, why the real asset in research has always been the connection to consumers, and how agentic AI is already reordering business models faster than most companies can respond. Lenny also shares a candid take on why many established firms are caught in the crosshairs, not because of a lack of talent, but because of a failure to adapt before the wave arrived.

The episode also touches on the future of live events and in-person connection, the upcoming IIEX conference in Washington, DC, and a new IIEX West launch in San Francisco, with Lenny making the case that human gatherings become more valuable, not less, as automation takes over routine work.

Key Takeaways:

• Why Lenny views AI as a restructuring event comparable to the printing press and industrial automation, not an ending

• How the research industry commoditized its own most valuable asset and what that means now

• Why the shift from process-based pricing to impact-based pricing is both necessary and overdue

• What the "reckoning still to come" looks like for established firms that have not adapted fast enough

• Why live events and in-person connections are poised to become more critical in an AI-driven world

If you loved the episode, have comments, or want to appear on the show, connect with us down below!

Connect with us:

• LinkedIn

• YouTube

• ROI Rocket

Connect with Lenny:

• LinkedIn