The Controversial 84% Cancer Study | Nicolas Hulscher | S9 - E1
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
In this video: The Controversial 84% Cancer Study | Nicolas Hulscher
✅Valasta Astaxanthin : https://valasta.net/
(Checkout with code POI5 for 5% discount)
✅BBACK Shoes: https://bbackworld.us
(Get 10% off your order with code POI10)
✅HAVN: havnwear.com (The world's first EMF-blocking clothing)
Discount code: POI15 for 15% off
Please register your patients at - www.tremorstudy.com
✅StemRegen: http://www.stemregen.co/drstephen
(Special Offer: Save 15% Using Code "SBPOD" At Checkout)
✅Nature's Marvels : https://profound-health.com/product-category/bioregulators/?aff=PODOF
(A Trusted Source for Natural & Synthetic Bioregulators)
Season 9 starts with one of the most controversial and data-heavy conversations we've released yet.
This week on Pod of Inquiry, we sit down with epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH of the McCullough Foundation to discuss a newly published prospective observational study involving 200 cancer patients prescribed off-label ivermectin and mebendazole through a telemedicine platform.
The headline finding:
84.4% of patients reported clinical benefit at six months — including 32% with no evidence of disease.
In this episode, we explore:
🧬 The surprising biological overlap between parasites and cancer cells
📊 What the real-world data actually showed across 20+ cancer types
💨 Why ivermectin once had one of the strongest safety reputations in medicine
💰 The financial realities surrounding off-patent therapies
⚠️ Rising concerns around aggressive cancers and excess mortality trends
📝 How peer review, publishing, and medical gatekeeping shape what reaches the public
🔬 Upcoming McCullough Foundation research on mortality data, VAERS trends, and more
Whether you're a clinician, patient, caregiver, or simply trying to make sense of the rapidly changing cancer landscape, this conversation dives into the claims, the controversies, and the data driving the debate.
Follow Pod of Inquiry
📘 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/podofinquiry
📸 Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/podofinquiry
🐦 X (Twitter): https://www.x.com/podofinquiry
🔗 LinkedIn (Dr. Stephen Barrett): https://www.linkedin.com/in/stephen-barrett-92776a51/
Visit our website https://podofinquiry.com/latest-episodes/ - click on the show link to read the show notes and get more information.
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
01:24 Nicolas Hulscher's Background
02:50 Parasites & Cancer Pathways
04:23 Ivermectin's Safety History
06:22 Study Design Explained
07:30 Cancer Patient Cohort
09:00 84.4% Clinical Benefit
10:50 Dosing & Side Effects
14:20 Chemotherapy Concerns
15:00 Sponsor — ValAsta
17:00 Chemo, Radiation & Biopsies
19:48 Study Censorship Claims
22:00 Why Off-Patent Drugs Aren't Studied
24:30 Trial Ethics Debate
26:30 The 'Journal Cartel'
30:00 Sponsor — BBACK 0524
31:30 What Real Science Should Look Like
34:26 Origins of 'Turbo Cancer' Research
36:00 Cancer in Younger Patients
38:42 The Rise of 'Turbo Cancer'
41:03 What's Next for McCullough Foundation
43:04 Where to Find Nicolas Hulscher
44:53 Sponsor — STEMRegen
47:03 Closing Remarks
-- Hashtags --
#CancerResearch #Ivermectin #Mebendazole #PodOfInquiry #NicolasHulscher #McCulloughFoundation #Oncology #MedicalResearch #HealthPodcast #CancerCare