Truth Based Media cover art

Truth Based Media

Truth Based Media

By: JD Rucker
Listen for free

About this listen

 Despite horrible ratings and pushback from their audiences, legacy media continues to be a cesspool of lies and bias. Even some of the "right-leaning" major publications are not serving the people properly. This is why Truth Based Media is so important. We strive to bring the news of the day to light with an unabashedly conservative viewpoint. We aren't pretending to be unbiased. We're definitely biased, and that's okay because we're honest about it. We are not pro-Republican. We're pro-America.

truthbasedmedia.substack.comJD Rucker Politics & Government
Episodes
  • President Trump Says Iran Agrees to No Nukes But Can He Trust Them?

    President Trump Says Iran Agrees to No Nukes But Can He Trust Them?
    Mar 24 2026
    * President Donald Trump stated that Iran has agreed to never possess nuclear weapons, describing it as a core condition for ending the ongoing conflict.* Trump emphasized the point repeatedly, calling it “number one, two and three” during remarks to reporters.* Tehran has not publicly confirmed any such agreement and Iranian officials have denied active negotiations with the United States.* The statement comes amid reports of indirect talks, a U.S. decision to postpone further strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure, and efforts to secure a broader deal.* Background includes prior U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran, concerns over enriched uranium stockpiles, and demands that go beyond nuclear issues.* Trump indicated optimism about “major points of agreement” while stressing verification and enforcement would be essential.* Markets reacted with falling oil prices following the comments, reflecting hopes of de-escalation.* The situation remains fluid, with Iranian denials raising questions about the precise status of any commitments.President Donald Trump declared Monday that Iran has conceded on the central U.S. demand in the current conflict: a permanent end to any pursuit of nuclear weapons.Speaking to reporters in Florida, the president left little room for ambiguity. “They’ve agreed,” he said. “They will never have a nuclear weapon. They’ve agreed to that.” He repeated the assertion for emphasis, adding that preventing a nuclear Iran stands as “number one, two and three” in any resolution.Some reports indicate skepticism about Iran’s willingness to abandon the program they have worked so diligently to build for decades. They are bound by a religious call to deceive “infidels” if it suits their purposes, which would align with years of claims that they were not pursuing nuclear weapons when it was blatantly obvious they were.The timing matters. Trump had recently postponed planned U.S. strikes on Iranian energy facilities, citing productive conversations. Those talks, according to the administration, involve multiple channels, including figures such as Jared Kushner and envoy Steve Witkoff. Reports suggest a potential framework covering not only the nuclear file but also the Strait of Hormuz, ballistic missiles, and sanctions relief.Iranian officials pushed back sharply. Tehran has publicly denied holding direct negotiations with Washington and dismissed aspects of Trump’s account as inconsistent with their position. A senior Iranian figure claimed no ongoing talks exist, while others labeled the statements an attempt to shape perceptions or markets.This latest development unfolds against a backdrop of heightened tensions that escalated earlier in 2026. U.S. and Israeli strikes targeted Iranian assets following the collapse of earlier diplomatic windows. The conflict has already claimed high-level Iranian leadership figures and drawn in regional actors. Trump’s administration has justified military pressure in part by pointing to Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and fears that the regime could cross the threshold to weaponization.Yet the president has also signaled a preference for resolution through strength rather than prolonged war. He described Iran as wanting a deal “very badly” and suggested the United States stands ready to retrieve enriched uranium as part of any final arrangement. Details remain sparse on exact mechanisms—whether full dismantlement of facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan, unrestricted IAEA access, or phased ballistic missile limits—but the nuclear prohibition forms the unmistakable red line.Skeptics note that Iran has long maintained its nuclear program serves civilian purposes and has pointed to a religious fatwa against weapons of mass destruction. U.S. intelligence assessments have varied over the years on the extent of active weaponization efforts. Trump’s first-term withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reflected deep distrust in that earlier framework, which he argued only delayed Iran’s ambitions without eliminating them.What distinguishes the current moment is the combination of military leverage and renewed diplomacy. By postponing additional strikes, the administration created space for dialogue. Trump indicated that nearly all points in a proposed understanding align, though he stopped short of declaring victory. “We’ll see where they lead,” he remarked, while underscoring that any outcome must deliver verifiable, irreversible steps.The economic signal arrived quickly. Oil prices dropped sharply on the news, with Brent crude falling more than 10 percent at one point, as traders weighed the possibility of restored stability in the Gulf and resumed energy flows.Still, the gap between announcement and implementation looms large. Without public Iranian acknowledgment, questions persist about whether the reported concession reflects a formal commitment, a negotiating posture, ...
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
  • Ten Nutritional Powerhouses the 'Science' Used to Claim Were Bad for Us

    Ten Nutritional Powerhouses the 'Science' Used to Claim Were Bad for Us
    Mar 22 2026

    For years, mainstream dietary advice painted certain whole foods as villains—blamed for heart disease, weight gain, and more. Much of this stemmed from flawed studies, often influenced by processed food industries pushing low-fat alternatives loaded with sugar. The outcome? Rising chronic illness despite “following the rules.” It’s time to reclaim nutrient-dense foods that humans have thrived on for generations.

    The biggest myth targeted saturated fats and dietary cholesterol, with no solid evidence linking them directly to heart disease in independent research. Sugar and refined carbs are the real drivers of inflammation and metabolic chaos. This shift frees us to embrace natural fats and cholesterol sources that support hormones, brain health, and cell repair—far superior to processed substitutes.

    Beyond fats, nutrient powerhouses like organ meats were dismissed as “gross” or too calorie-dense, while antioxidant-rich items faced scrutiny over sugar or caffeine. In reality, these deliver highly bioavailable vitamins, minerals, and protective compounds missing from modern processed diets. Choosing them prioritizes nutrient synergy over simplistic calorie math, promoting real prevention and vitality.

    Here are 10 foods you were once warned against—now recognized as nutritional stars when sourced well and enjoyed in balance:

    * Coconut oil — Its medium-chain triglycerides act as an antimicrobial and quick energy source, boosting metabolism and immunity without the feared heart risks from saturated fats.

    * Egg yolks — Packed with highly absorbable choline for brain function and true vitamin A; dietary cholesterol has little effect on blood levels compared to excess sugars.

    * Grass-fed beef — Offers superior bioavailable iron, zinc, and creatine for energy and muscle support, with no proven direct connection to heart disease unlike processed meats.

    * Organ meats — The ultimate in nutrient density, providing vitamins and minerals in their most usable forms to correct widespread deficiencies from processed eating.

    * Liver — Nature’s true multivitamin, loaded with real vitamin A, complete B vitamins, and copper to rebuild energy, immunity, and mineral reserves.

    * Sardines — An affordable omega-3 and vitamin D powerhouse, plus calcium from edible bones—ideal for brain, bone, and anti-inflammatory benefits.

    * Nuts — Deliver vitamin E, selenium, and magnesium for heart protection and fullness; their advantages far outweigh old calorie-counting concerns in reasonable portions.

    * Dark chocolate (70%+ cacao) — One of the planet’s richest antioxidant sources, combating inflammation and DNA damage—skip added sugars for maximum benefit.

    * Coffee — Supplies abundant antioxidants tied to lower risks of type 2 diabetes and brain diseases; daily moderate use can be genuinely protective.

    * Bananas — Rich in potassium and fiber to steady blood sugar and pressure; a convenient, whole-food carb that fits smart, balanced nutrition.

    Adding these thoughtfully upgrades meals from restrictive to genuinely nourishing. Opt for high-quality sources—grass-fed, wild-caught, or organic—and try simple preparations to savor their natural taste without overcomplicating things.

    Ditching outdated dietary fear-mongering for honest, unprocessed eating restores true health autonomy. As awareness grows about corporate-driven misinformation, the route to wellness becomes straightforward: trust time-tested, nutrient-packed foods already on your plate. Feed your body what nature designed, not what profit motives promote.

    Article inspired by Natural News.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit truthbasedmedia.substack.com
    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • Legacy Media and Democrats Are Gaslighting About the Shutdown While Republicans Refuse to Fight Back

    Legacy Media and Democrats Are Gaslighting About the Shutdown While Republicans Refuse to Fight Back
    Mar 16 2026
    In the midst of a partial government shutdown that began on February 14, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) finds itself at the center of a heated political battle. Funding for the agency lapsed after Congress failed to reach an agreement, leaving over 260,000 employees in limbo across agencies like TSA, FEMA, and the Coast Guard. While essential immigration enforcement operations by ICE and CBP continue uninterrupted—thanks to a massive $140 billion infusion from last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act—the impasse has exposed deep divisions over immigration policy.Yet, legacy media outlets like CBS News are spinning the narrative in a way that downplays the core issues, focusing instead on superficial demands to paint Democrats as reasonable reformers.CBS News has repeatedly highlighted Democrats’ calls for immigration agents to wear body cameras, display identification, and refrain from wearing face masks during operations. Headlines and segments emphasize these “accountability measures” as the primary sticking points, framing the shutdown as a fight over transparency and safety for agents and the public alike.This portrayal suggests a commonsense push for better practices, especially in the wake of incidents like the Minneapolis shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by immigration officers last month. But this is classic gaslighting—diverting attention from the Democrats’ more radical demands that could cripple enforcement efforts.Other media echoes this sentiment. Reports describe Democrats’ agenda as simply requiring agents to “identify themselves” and banning masks to end “secret police” tactics. It’s presented as a moderate response to public outcry, with little mention of how these elements are bundled with far-reaching changes. The result? A public perception that the shutdown is about minor procedural tweaks, not a fundamental overhaul of immigration law.At the heart of the Democrats’ demands lies a push to replace administrative warrants—long-standing tools used by ICE for efficient deportations—with judicial warrants for arrests on private property. Administrative warrants, authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act, allow agents to act swiftly without needing a judge’s approval for every action. Requiring judicial warrants would add layers of bureaucracy, greatly delaying operations and allowing targets to evade capture. This isn’t about accountability; it’s about hamstringing ICE’s ability to enforce existing laws, especially amid the Trump administration’s mass deportation initiatives. FactCheck.org and PBS News coverage confirms this as a central Democratic demand.Democrats argue that judicial warrants protect everyday Americans from overreach, citing the need to verify citizenship before detentions and end practices based on race, language, or accent. But this ignores that current protocols already include safeguards, and the change would effectively rewrite immigration enforcement from the ground up. By burying this demand under talk of masks and badges, Democrats and their media allies are engaging in deliberate misdirection, gaslighting the American public into believing the fight is over optics rather than operational paralysis.Republicans, for their part, have been frustratingly passive in countering this narrative. While they’ve warned that Democrats’ demands would make agents “totally vulnerable” and disrupt national security, they’ve failed to aggressively highlight the warrant issue as the real threat. Instead of mounting a full-throated defense in press conferences or on social media, GOP leaders have stuck to procedural votes and vague statements about urgency amid external threats like the war with Iran. This reluctance to fight back allows the gaslighting to persist unchecked.As the shutdown drags into its second week with no resolution in sight, the American people deserve transparency about what’s truly at stake. Here are the key ways legacy media and Democrats are distorting the debate:* Focus on Face Masks: Media outlets emphasize banning masks as a “masks off” policy for accountability, but it’s a red herring that distracts from how it could expose agents to greater risks without addressing core enforcement tools. See CBS News reporting.* Name Badges and Body Cameras: Framed as simple identification requirements, these are portrayed as harmless reforms, yet they’re packaged with demands that could slow down deportations nationwide.* Downplaying Judicial Warrants: The push to mandate court-approved warrants is rarely headlined, allowing the narrative to shift away from how this would bog down ICE in legal hurdles and undermine border security. Democrats have explicitly tied this to funding, per LA Times coverage.* Ignoring Republican Concerns: Coverage often omits GOP arguments that these changes tie immigration policy to funding, risking disruptions to critical operations beyond ...
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
No reviews yet