When We Disagree cover art

When We Disagree

When We Disagree

By: Michael Lee
Listen for free

What's a disagreement you can’t get out of your head? When We Disagree highlights the arguments that stuck with us, one story at a time.


© 2026 When We Disagree
Social Sciences
Episodes
  • Season 3 Finale: Can Civility Survive Modern Politics? Meet a Lawmaker Who Said Yes
    May 27 2026


    Former Minnesota State Representative Sandra Feist, who led the state's Civility Caucus and practices as an immigration attorney, shares two contrasting stories of political conflict. She details how an out-of-context tweet by a Republican colleague was successfully defused through direct, personal communication and shared policy expertise, eventually leading to a meaningful piece of bipartisan legislation. In contrast, she examines a separate floor altercation that spiraled into tribal posturing, partisan t-shirts, and a pointless digital media fight that left hard feelings on both sides of the aisle. Through these examples, Representative Feist pulls back the curtain on how interpersonal relationships can either forge cross-party solutions or amplify modern political theater.


    Tell us your argument stories!

    • Email guest and topic suggestions to us at whenwedisagree@gmail.com
    • Follow us on Instagram



    Show More Show Less
    24 mins
  • You Are Not a Pawn: Reclaiming Attention in a Wired World
    May 27 2026

    Gloria Mark (attention expert, author of Attention Span and The Future of Attention Substack) challenges the reigning cultural narrative that tech giants have completely hijacked our brains. Debating those she calls "techno-determinists," Mark pushes back against the viral idea that users are merely helpless pawns to the addictive algorithms of TikTok and YouTube. While she freely acknowledges that big tech shares some of the blame, she brings a data-driven defense of human agency, showing how quickly mindless habits can form, but also how successfully they can be rewired. Rather than prescribing a hopeless path of total digital abstinence, she outlines a liberating framework of intentional reframing, showing us how to reclaim our free will and transform our devices from endless dopamine traps back into simple, purpose-driven tools

    Tell us your argument stories!

    • Email guest and topic suggestions to us at whenwedisagree@gmail.com
    • Follow us on Instagram



    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • Anatomy of a Digital Boycott: When the Crowd Demands Retribution
    May 20 2026


    Katherine Brodsky, host of the Forbidden Conversations podcast and author of No Apologies: How to Find and Free Your Voice in an Age of Outrage, was the target of a cancellation attempt. While managing an online professional network for women journalists, an Fox News job posting on the forum triggered a cascade of intense community outrage. Brodsky explores the severe consequences she faced when she tried to steer the forum away from partisan politics and personal attacks, including online cancellation campaigns, bad-faith labels, and attempts to weaponize her past employers against her. This conversation pulls back the curtain on the hyper-reactive nature of digital spaces and the intense social pressure to conform, tracing how a self-described "people pleaser" found her own voice by navigating an online thunderdome.


    Tell us your argument stories!

    • Email guest and topic suggestions to us at whenwedisagree@gmail.com
    • Follow us on Instagram



    Show More Show Less
    27 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
No reviews yet